Skip to content
Israels Neuman, PLC

Israels Neuman, PLC

10.0David P Neuman

Call for a Free Consultation

(720) 599-3505

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Investment Fraud and Broker Negligence
      • Breach of Fiduciary Duty
      • Broker Negligence
      • Business Development Companies (or BDCs)
      • Churning and Excessive Trading
      • Excessive Margin Trading
      • Failure to Diversify Investments
      • Failure to Supervise
      • FINRA Arbitration
      • Inverse or Leveraged ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds)
      • Material Misrepresentations
      • Non-Traded REITs
      • Ponzi Schemes
      • Selling Away
      • Unauthorized Trading
      • Unsuitable Investments
      • Use of Home Equity to Invest
      • Variable Annuity Fraud
  • Attorneys
    • Aaron Israels
    • David Neuman
    • Press/News
  • Blog
  • Legal Resources
  • Contact

FINRA Fines VALIC Financial Advisors $1.75 Million in Variable Annuity Sales

SEARCH OUR BLOGS
28
Nov

FINRA Fines VALIC Financial Advisors $1.75 Million in Variable Annuity Sales

INVESTOR ALERT! Chelsea Financial Services and Charles Bloom in Royal Palm Beach, FL

FINRA Fines VALIC Financial Advisors $1.75 Million Regarding Variable Annuity Sales and Other Allegations

 

FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) recently brought a regulator action against VALIC Financial Advisors for the sales of multi-share class variable annuities.  VALIC Financial Advisors, which is a Houston, Texas-based securities brokerage firm, was alleged to have violated securities rules and regulations in several aspects, including: a) failing to address conflicts of interest in its compensation policy; b) systemic failures in the supervision of certain aspects of sales of variable annuities; c) failure to establish written supervisory procedures relating to the sale of multi-share class variable annuities; d) failure to enforce its written supervisory procedures related to reviews of emails; and e) failures related to customer complaint reporting.

 

Multi-Share Class Variable Annuity Sales

 

According to FINRA’s allegations, VALIC Financial Advisors failed to maintain an adequate supervisory system to detect red flags associated with selling multi-share class variable annuities.  VALIC was selling L-share annuities, which typically have a shorter surrender period (usually 3 to 4 years) than B-share annuities, which often have 7 year surrender periods.  However, the L-share variable annuities typically have higher annual fees.  For an investor who held the L-share annuities longer than the surrender period, they were paying higher fees than what they needed.  According to Investmentnews.com, some firms have ceased sales of L-share annuities.

 

FINRA alleged that VALIC’s training materials failed to educate its advisors on the features of the various variable annuity share types.  To settle these allegations, VALIC agreed to pay a fine of $1,750,000.

 

Our attorneys have represented over one thousand investors who have been defrauded by financial advisors and brokerage firms.  While we have offices in Denver and the Seattle area, we have also previously represented clients throughout the country, including former clients of VALIC Financial Advisors who lost money with Jodie Miller.

 

Click to view:  VALIC FINRA AWC

 

HAVE YOU LOST MONEY WITH VALIC FINANCIAL ADVISORS?

             CONTACT ISRAELS & NEUMAN, PLC FOR A FREE CASE EVALUATION

             Aaron Israels: (720) 599-3505

             David Neuman: (206) 795-5798

 

Israels & Neuman, PLC is a private law firm and is not affiliated with any government or law enforcement agency.  Any investigation referenced in this blog is independent in nature and is being conducted by our law firm privately, not in conjunction with any government or law enforcement agency.  All information contained in this blog should be deemed statements of opinion derived from the author’s review of public records, not statements of fact.  This blog is advertising material and does not create an attorney client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice.  Everyone’s situation is different and the question of whether or not you have a claim will vary on a case-by-case basis.  In contingent representation, clients may still be liable for costs.

 

Tweet

Post navigation

previous Previous post: WARNING! Investigation of JEFFREY HILL and DOUGHERTY & COMPANY–Bemidji, Minnesota
next Next post: UPDATE! STEPHEN EUBANKS Arrested for FRAUD–Hingham, MA

FROM THE BLOG

  • DANIEL DENO of LPL Financial ARRESTED FOR FRAUD

    LPL Financial Advisor Daniel Deno Arrested OWENSBORO, KENTUCKY     Did you …Read More »
Israels & Neuman, PLC
Name
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
10.0David P Neuman
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Blog
  • Legal Resources
  • Contact
Copyright © 2021 Israels Neuman, PLC. All Rights Reserved